while clipping the papers this morning, i found out from james that the house of commons passed a motion that stated that maclean’s magazine’s october fourth issue was to be removed from shelves due to its “offensive” cover.<\/p>\n
it honestly is<\/em> too early for this, so i’m not gonna get into the nitty gritty of this story. if you wanna read bout it, you can READ ABOUT IT HERE<\/a>. but i am gonna voice my two cents.<\/p>\n the house of commons <\/strong>is going to prohibit vendors from distributing a factually acurate<\/strong> article about political corruption<\/strong>, because they find the image of a snowman mascot <\/strong>with a briefcase of money offensive? what is going on here?? when i say that we are standing at the top of a hill gazing down at a very slippery slope, and that allowing for this kind of precedent is a hop, skip and a few critical missteps away from a very unpleasnt future, i don’t have to refer to some fictional orwellian regime; there are more than a few from both the past and the present that demonstrate it quite nicely.<\/p>\n didn’t the nazi’s burn books? why, yes, i do believe they did.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" while clipping the papers this morning, i found out from james that the house of commons passed a motion that stated that maclean’s magazine’s october fourth issue was to be removed from shelves due to its “offensive” cover. it honestly … Continue reading